Français | English
Conferences       Bibliography       Links       About Us


The challenge of reading in a virtual space
Christian Vandendorpe
(Translated from French by Christian Vandendorpe)


 Moderators: Olivier Foury, Gloria Origgi
 

The replacement of the scroll by the codex shows that the law of progress affects also the type of support used for texts. A technology of writing which is better suited to the communication of ideas will necessarily replace the former one. The question today is to determine whether the new digital environment will take over the book or if a way of reading perfectly suited to the book, like the one needed for reading a novel, will fade away and slowly disappear.

Various formats of print other than the book are circulating today, such as the newspaper and the magazine. Nevertheless, all these formats share the same characteristic : they consist of pages through which one can flip.

The book is mainly associated with the novel, a genre that gained a wide acceptance one century after Gutenberg and which came to be seen as the epitome of literature. The novel requires a “reading pact” with the reader characterized by its totality and its continuity. A continuous reading of the book, following the order set by the author, is a precondition for the reader to experience the satisfaction promised by the novel and to eventually arrive at a better understanding of life, himself or the society.

Very different from the book, the newspaper asks for a completely different reading pact. The reader may scan the titles and catch just a few sentences of an article before going to another one, much like a bee going from one flower to another. This way of reading is encouraged by the organisation of the articles (the so-called inverted pyramid), the numerous subtitles and the disposition by columns on the page.

The magazine elicits still a different reading pact. Its format is better suited to a continuous reading than the newspaper, but it is still possible for the reader to flip through a variety of subjects, in search of something of interest.

Although these formats have existed for almost two centuries, the magazine is presently winning a greater part of the time devoted to reading, at the expense of the novel.

The arrival of the WWW has created a new situation. With its rapidly growing mass of information on any subject, the Web is the apotheosis of the Book, the ultimate library.

This new library, however, is not built upon the book but upon the database model, which elicits its own textual organization. When assembling a database, one does not try to keep the readers continuously reading, but to answer their questions as effectively as possible. The tabular disposition of the various fields of the database on the screen allows the reader to select the exact piece of information desired. Very often, the best databases are a mix of bits of information and small narratives related to them. For example, a big database like All Movie Guide offers for each movie a plot synopsis, a review of the movie, a biography of the director and the actors, as well as links to other related movies. This mode of organization encourages a way of reading that is very focused, although limited in the time spent continuously on a same subject. And it does not exclude the serendipity generally associated with literary works.

The newspaper and the magazine migrated very easily to this environment while the novel has resisted. Various reasons oppose the reading pact of the novel migrating easily to the screen.

i. The book consists of a foliated space which allows the copresence of the pages that have been read and those still to be read. It provides the readers with an analog mark signalling their position in the totality of the text.
ii. Pagination gives a digital mark to the same effect. It allows the reader to finely tune the time dedicated to reading.
iii. The text is printed without all the lateral distractions of a web page, which eliminates the temptation to zap out at any moment.
iv. The dedication of the reader is facilitated by the extraordinary handiness of the book.

In order to display a text on a screen, one has to choose between two possibilities : either vertical scrolling, which goes back to the old age of the volumen, or the lateral flip of virtual pages. The scrolling is not adequate for a long text because it does not allow the readers to manage their time nor to easily find the place where they stopped at a previous session. The lateral flip takes away the illusion of the presence of the previous pages. This inconvenience can be compensated by various visual metaphors. One of these is to reproduce on the screen a digital clone of the printed page, as they did with the e-book.

The ideal solution would be an object like the codex, with multiple pages of a flexible material that could be read in any position without the necessity of a backlight and consuming a very small amount of energy.

This object is on its way, with the technology being developed by E ink Corporation. They have already designed a material which is half the thickness of a credit card. Some big publishers have a partnership with that company.

With this kind of digital codex, the book would be born again as a complex tool able to combine the functions of a book, a personal computer, a personal digital assistant and a writing tablet. The digital codex would allow our society to get out of the schizophrenic situation in which we are today, where the works most patiently researched, written and edited are divorced from the medium that could give them the greatest audience and circulation, a medium that embodies today the very ideal of the book as a vehicle to communicate from mind to mind through time and space.

Open Pâte (à papier) feuilletée ! (1 reply)
Patrick Altman, Jan 14, 2003 10:34 UT
Open Quid des autres usages de l'espace feuilleté ? (1 reply)
Pierre Schweitzer, Dec 14, 2002 23:45 UT
Open Que représente le livre dans l'univers du numérique ? (2 replies)
Gautier Poupeau, Dec 3, 2002 22:03 UT
Open Re-optimizing the Virtual Book (3 replies)
Stevan Harnad, Dec 2, 2002 13:49 UT
Open Trois questions, au moins (1 reply)
Rémi Froger, Nov 28, 2002 15:15 UT
Open Comparaison (0 replies)
Clotilde Lampignano, Nov 28, 2002 8:24 UT
Close Quelle est la vraie valeur ajoutée du feuilletage ?  
Jean-Michel Salaün
Nov 26, 2002 18:17 UT

Contrairement à Christian, je ne suis pas du tout persuadé que la fonction de feuilletage d'un "codex électronique" soit un vraie valeur ajoutée pour un livre numérique. Il me semble qu'il y a là une erreur : l'originalité du livre papier (comme d'ailleurs du journal papier) est d'être une totalité permanente. Inversement le "plus" de l'écran est au contraire d'être une tête de réseau. La notion de feuilletage est liée à cette permanence et nécessite donc d'accéder visuellement au document complet. Le papier est là imbattable.
Quel sera l'intérêt supplémentaire d'avoir quelques pages éphémères d'un livre, plutôt qu'une tablette, qui peut faire un support de substitution tout à fait acceptable pour un livre qu'on ne voudrait pas réellement "acquérir" ?
Un symptôme de cette différence entre support permanent et éphémère est justement (contrairement à ce qu'indique Christian) la grande difficulté à décliner un journal sur le web. Le rythme temporel, la mise en page, les liens, le modèle économique ne sont pas facilement transposables entre un objet et une tête de réseau.

Cf. le Jeudi du numérique "La presse sur le Web" http://isdn.enssib.fr/archives/presse/pr...

  5 replies to Quelle est la vraie valeur ajoutée du feuilletage ?:
    Open La geste intellectuelle du geste...
Emmanuël Souchier, Feb 13, 2003 18:16 UT
    Open Des écrans plein la vue
Christian Vandendorpe, Dec 14, 2002 21:15 UT
    Open Inconvenients du feuilletage électronique
Jean-Michel Salaün, Dec 4, 2002 15:42 UT
    Close Avantages du feuilletage
Christian Vandendorpe
Dec 1, 2002 15:00 UT

Rien ne s’oppose à ce que l’on combine dans un même objet la totalité permanente du codex avec la fonction hypertexte du Web. Au contraire ! Cette recherche du meilleur des deux mondes est tout à fait conforme à la longue quête de maniabilité et d'ergonomie qu'est l’histoire du livre.

Certes, on peut se contenter pour la lecture d’un roman de la solution proposée par le format e-book, avec les pages défilant dans une fenêtre unique. Cette solution est certainement viable et bien des lecteurs pourront s’en contenter à défaut d’avoir sous la main le livre imprimé. Mais ce modèle ne pourra pas rivaliser avec un codex électronique capable d’afficher du texte sur une centaine de pages et que l’on pourrait feuilleter comme un codex.

Je vois au moins trois avantages au feuilletage :

1) Le premier est de recréer l’espace de la double page, qui est, selon Fernand Baudin, “de mémoire de scribe et de typo, l'unité visuelle dans l'espace d'un livre”. En accroissant la surface de texte disponible, on accroît aussi le contexte immédiat de la lecture, élément essentiel pour faciliter la gestion du sens.

2) Une structure feuilletée permet au lecteur de situer son activité de lecture dans une certaine continuité, grâce à laquelle il lui est possible d’effectuer facilement des retours en arrière sans perdre de vue la page qu’il est en train de lire, en bénéficiant du double repérage qu’est la pagination et sa position de lecture dans l’espace fixe de la page. Ce sont là des avantages fort précieux pour qui est engagé dans la lecture intensive et approfondie d’un manuel, d’un traité, d’un roman.

3) Enfin, une structure feuilletée, en multipliant par cinquante ou par cent l’espace de l’écran, donnerait infiniment plus de latitude pour gérer les diverses facettes de l’activité de lecture, garder à la vue les lectures à faire ou en cours et disposer d’espaces d’affichage permanent.

    Open Quelle est la signification du feuilletage?
Claude Paré, Nov 28, 2002 1:01 UT
 
Note: yellow triangles (   ) indicate new messages that have been posted since your last visit to the site.
 
© 2008 interdisciplines.